Validation · Division I pilot

Movement quality drives performance. We proved it on the floor.

bodbx is a portable computer-vision device that measures athletic movement quality and links it to performance outcomes. We deployed it inside a Division I Olympic-sports S&C program to analyze dryland movement and relate it to performance under fatigue, three lift sessions a week across two deployment periods.

Program: Division I S&C Program Sport: Competitive swimming Method: Joint-level CV vs. reference models Status: Pilots 1 & 2 complete

Core finding

Higher hinge quality, roughly half the fatigue.

~2×

Hinge movement quality predicted fatigue resistance

Athletes scoring 75–85 on hinge mechanics showed ~4–8% performance drop-off across repeated efforts. Athletes at 55–65 showed ~8-15%, about double the fatigue accumulation, and consistent across sessions.

Hinge score vs. fatigue drop-off

Preliminary D1 mid-distance data 48 1114 557085 Hinge score Fatigue % drop-off

Each point is an athlete. Higher hinge quality → lower fatigue drop-off, lining up with pacing and late-set performance in the water.

What the staff saw

It matched the eye. Then went further.

✓

Movement scores aligned closely with what experienced coaches already saw intuitively, establishing trust in the measurement.

✓

The system surfaced individual differences that are difficult to track consistently by eye, athlete by athlete.

✓

Regression analysis helped identify which movements mattered most for which athlete.

This could really change the game. The gold is in the regression linking.
Division I Strength & Conditioning Coach · has worked with Olympic-level athletes
This is fascinating, some of the correlations were not what I would've expected, but your recommendations for the next phase are supported, and I concur with them.
Swim Coach, Virginia
The coaching cues are especially helpful and show how this can be applied in a program like ours.
Joel Thomas, USA Swimming coach

The dashboard

What the regression looks like in practice.

Movement score on the x-axis, 100 Free time on the y-axis. R² = 0.88 across five sessions. The dashboard surfaces this correlation automatically for every athlete.

bodbx coach dashboard showing performance correlation between movement score and 100 Free time, with trend labeled Higher score — faster

How bodbx measures movement

Joint-level motion vs. a trained reference

bodbx captures joint-level motion and compares each rep against trained reference models to quantify movement quality. Deviations in mid-phase and end-range correspond to reduced movement efficiency. That is the exact moment a cue can fix.

Hinge-based movements (RDL, hip thrust, good-morning family) produce the clearest, most consistent signal. Breakdowns tend to occur mid-rep and at end-range, and athlete-specific patterns hold across sessions.

Depth Drop, Left Shoulder

0.00.51.0 Movement % Scaled path
Athlete Reference

Separation through the absorption phase and end-range = lost efficiency, and a clear cueing target.

In the field

Two deployment phases inside a D1 weight room.

bodbx devices deployed in a weight roomcoach reviewing athlete movement scores on the bodbx dashboardbodbx portable movement-analysis device

Note: figures reflect preliminary pilot data and are directional. n is small and analysis is ongoing; the next phase expands the dataset and refines movement-to-performance models. Program identity and staff names withheld pending public-use permission; results shown are anonymized.

Want to run the next pilot?

We're expanding to more collegiate and club programs. Bring your roster, we'll bring the measurement.

Book a demo